21 Unanswered Questions That They Don’t Want You To Look Into – Full List
Share this Article
Do you ever get the feeling that the mainstream media is feeding you a very watered-down and twisted version of the news? Do you ever get the feeling that the federal government does not believe that the American people can actually be trusted with the truth? It is exasperating to realize that the news that the public is being fed every single day is very heavily filtered and very heavily censored. In a world where “spin” is everything, simply telling the truth is a revolutionary act. Fortunately, the Internet has helped fuel the rise of the alternative media, and millions of Americans that are starting to wake up are turning to the alternative media for answers to their unanswered questions. Increasingly, people are becoming willing to question the orthodoxy that is being shoved down their throats by the major news networks, and that is a very good thing. The world is becoming an incredibly unstable place, and it is more imperative than ever that we all learn to think for ourselves. We live during a time of great deception, and the lies are going to get even bigger and even more bold in the years to come. If we don’t know why we believe what we believe, then we are in danger of falling for just about anything.
It is those that seek the truth that end up finding it. If you just accept the version of reality that the system wants to feed you, then you are probably going to become what the system wants you to become.
But if you are not afraid to question everything, then you will have a chance to become everything that you were always meant to be.
So what are some things that we should be questioning right now?
The following are 21 unanswered questions that they don’t want you to look into….
#1 Why is the TSA being allowed to conduct warrantless searches at bus stations and train stations all over America? According to an article in the Guardian, the following motto is displayed at the TSA’s air marshal training center: “Dominate. Intimidate. Control.” Why is there no outrage over this?
#2 Why does the TSA believe that it is necessary to pat-down a 7-year-old girl with cerebral palsy? Does touching the private areas of disabled little girls really improve our national security?
#3 Why does the Department of Homeland Security need Predator-B drones to patrol the border between the United States and Canada?
#4 Why is a militarized “Red Zone” being set up in Chicago three weeks prior to the upcoming NATO summit on May 20th and 21st?
#5 Why is the Milwaukee Red Cross being told to prepare for an evacuation of Chicago?
#6 Why is cesium-137 from the Fukushima nuclear disaster still showing up in milk in Montpelier, Vermont? The following is from a recent Forbes article….
Radiation from Japan has been detected in drinking water in 13 more American cities, and cesium-137 has been found in American milk—in Montpelier, Vermont—for the first time since the Japan nuclear disaster began, according to data released by the Environmental Protection Agency late Friday.
#7 Why is there such little uproar over CISPA? CISPA is going to allow companies to share our private online information with the government almost at will. The following is from an article posted on the website of the Electronic Frontier Foundation….
CISPA creates an exception to all privacy laws to permit companies to share our information with each other and with the government in the name of cybersecurity. … CISPA’s ‘information sharing’ regime allows the transfer of vast amounts of data, including sensitive information like internet use history or the content of emails, to any agency in the government including military and intelligence agencies like the National Security Agency or the Department of Defense Cyber Command. Once in government hands, this information can be used for any non-regulatory purpose so long as one significant purpose is for cybersecurity or to protect national security.
#8 Why aren’t more people in the mainstream media alarmed that the economies of 11 different western nations have plunged into recession?
#9 Why did an ounce of gold only cost $58 in 1972 but it costs more than $1660 today?
#10 Why has the median price of a new home risen from $17,200 in 1963 to $212,000 today?
#11 Why are so many banks issuing credit cards that can have information silently stolen off of them by any thief that is willing to invest in a contactless credit card reader?
#12 Why have most Americans never even heard of the University of Pittsburgh study that found that common vaccines that we give our children produce autism-like symptoms in monkeys?
#13 Why is Wall Street laying off thousands of workers if the economy is getting better?
#14 Why has Spain banned all cash transactions over 2,500 euros?
#15 Why is there such a push to get more kids to go to college if most college graduates cannot find a decent job once they graduate? Why is Mitt Romney telling young Americans to borrow money from their parents to get the education that they “need”?
#16 Why does the mainstream media in America almost completely ignore the brutal terror attacks that happen regularly in many countries in Africa? For example, just the other day more than a dozen Christians were killed by a terror attack in the northern Nigerian city of Kano. Back in January, nearly 200 were killed in coordinated attacks in that same city. So why does the U.S. media very rarely ever talk about this?
#17 Why was a radical activist who once stated that he “wished all Republicans were ****ing dead” invited to speak at the National High School Journalism Convention? Is it any surprise that he declared to his audience of high school students that we should all “learn to ignore the bulls— in the Bible“?
#18 Why did Barack Obama recently update an old executive order so that now he will be able to take charge of all food, all energy, all health resources and all transportation resources in the United States even in “non-emergency” situations?
#19 Why are federal government agencies stockpiling massive amounts of food and ammunition? Do they know something that we don’t?
#20 Why will a mysterious Spanish company be reporting the election results for hundreds of U.S. jurisdictions on election day 2012?
#21 Why do “scientific reports” that proclaim that there is a desperate need for global population control get very prominent coverage in newspapers all over the western world?
|
|
11:17 am
Crap journalism. Fake news full of one-sided spin, designed to scare the gullible public into parting with their money by subscribing to one of your wacked out investment newsletters. It's a great day in Advertising……
1:06 pm
This is a truly uninformed article. There are very logical explanations to most if not all of these "unanswered" questions if one took 5 minutes to look.
2:26 pm
yours is a truly moot point. Can you honestly answer all of these questions with a full explanation. Including the history of what caused the action involved in the question to become a necessity. If you can… do it. Also take the time to cite exactly who and where it is you are getting these explanations from (this part is very important).
Please inform us of exactly why this article is uninformed.
1:44 pm
You are obviously still asleep in the light. You should take your own advice and spend an Hour looking into some of these issues, 5 minutes wouldn't get you anywhere. There is so much info out there now, if you take the time to look – you won't be able to say honestly that this stuff is bunk. I hope you find the truth, Meep.
6:01 pm
#6: SInce when can we trust anything that comes from the EPA?
9:04 am
I think I actually got less intelligent after reading this
11:40 pm
Which "they" doesn't want me to look into it?
11:43 pm
In #21, what is the significance of putting quotes on "scientific reports"? Why does the link only point to an instance of such a report? The question was about "very prominent coverage." Where is the discussion of how much coverage counts as "very prominent"?
7:46 am
#19 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth is going to lead to a repeat of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007%E2%80%932008_wo…
9:41 am
I find it disturbing that you don't quote direct sources, but quote other sites that did the "research" for you. Why are you so willing to disbelieve mass-media outlets, but accept unquestioningly the second hand reports (that have quite clearly cherry picked quotes that support their agendas) posted on the internet? If your going to question what's true (which I think is a very healthy practice), you should question everyone and look into direct sources for yourself not rely on the biased gobbledy-gook posted up on the net.
10:00 am
I should add as an amendment, I appreciate that the "The American Dream" articles have a certain amount of first-hand research, but they're also full of speculation and leaps of logic that have no scholarly merit. A lot of the concerns brought up seem to verge on paranoia.
11:46 am
Through my childhood and into my 20's most evenings on the east coast where I lived presented me with a spectacular red sunset. Gorgeous. Now they are rare things that occur only when there has been major volcanic activity somewhere in the world. Those old sunsets were beautiful, but they happened because of particulate matter in the air that didn't belong there. If our air is cleaner now that it was in the 60's and 70's, we can thank the EPA. What I'm not sure I trust is Yolo, they seem to go for a very sensationalistic presentation of their info.
10:21 am
You make very good observations. I agree with your evaluation of this presentation. I was lured in by the title of the article and very disappointed with the "results". I think the comments on here are better than the article itself.
3:39 pm
Some good questions but now answers. get back to me when there's something I can do about any of this.
9:56 am
You actually used WorldNutDaily and VacFacts as sources. That alone says terrible things about the quality of this list. The Forbes article you linked to was from a year ago (not exactly recent), the "population control" coverage was one article in the guardian. #18 was Obama reauthorizing a bill with the exact same language it's had for the past 18 years. #17 if you don't recognize that there's a lot of bullsh*t in the bible, you're blind. #16, There's actually pretty decent coverage of most of the terrorist attacks in Africa. For example, look up articles on child witches (frequently tortured and killed by their Good Christian Communities). You probably think that asking a bunch of questions to which most people won't actually look for the answers (or will follow the links to terrible sources) makes you look clever, but please remove your tinfoil hat and don't be a conspiracy-mongering buffoon.
11:56 am
Yeah, I'd say the crazy here is so thick you can cut it with a knife. So much for my hope that this might be an informative non-wingnut link…
11:52 am
Who is the "they" that supposedly doesn't want us "to look into" these "questions"?? LOL. I disagree that there is any person or entity that is worried about us "finding out the truth" of these matters. The truth is that the way you have presented this list of questions is deceptively suggestive in and of itself. What is your point with all this? What are you trying to say? Why not just come out and say it? Otherwise this is ironically the same type of potentially misleading propaganda you purport to be standing tall against. As someone already stated here, many of these questions have legitimate and reasonable answers and are simply not connected to the other questions as their juxtaposition by you would imply. Take a deep breath my friend. There's no great conspiracy going on. We are living in the digital age. The first whiff of any such state action or even a mass organized private action. You can't even fart anymore without creating a headline on Facebook. Have some faith my paranoid friend. I'm not saying you're crazy or that your questions are bad ones but just that most, if not all of them, have legitimate answers and they are not suggestive of anything that we should be "worried" about in my humble opinion. But I'm not saying "go away" or "roll over" or "go to sleep", not by a long shot. STAY VIGILANT my friend. Just remember to always be reasonable and sensible in your analysis of events and motivations. The sky is not falling just yet, but thank you for this thought provoking list.
1:08 pm
#17 was Dan Savage and he's not a radical activist he's a sex advice columnist who's gay and does push for the gay marriage amendment to be passed. That's all he's "radical" about. He talked about this speech he gave on his podcast. I was actually all for this list until I got to this question then I laughed loudly.